Lloyd’s List Intelligence for Maritime and Family History

Lloyds List 1

Guildhall Library’s historic ‘Lloyd’s Marine Collection’ offers information about vessels, shipping movements and casualties for your maritime research dating back to 1740.

If you are looking for more recent sources for your family or maritime history the Library subscribes to the Lloyd’s List Intelligence (LLI) ‘Seasearcher’ service, a website which includes an invaluable archive of shipping movements from 1997 to the present.

This impressive addition to our maritime resources offers searches by shipping company which can supply maritime enthusiasts with fleet details, history of ownership, brief details of incidents and vessel reports. LLI describe Seasearcher as ‘your digital engine room’ and you are welcome to visit to explore.

A highlight of the service is the ability to search by place and discover which ships were in port on a given day; so on the 21st June 1998 we can see that there were ten arrivals at Southampton. These included four vehicle carriers (‘Setubal’, ‘Golden Ray’, ‘Elduga’, ‘Jingu’), the refrigerated cargo ship ‘Dunedin Star’ and the ‘V.Express’ (roll on –roll off)

An example of the depth of information you can find on a vessel would be the ‘Queen Mary 2’. Apart from giving the detail you would expect to find in our ‘Lloyd’s Register of Ships’ like official number, flag, tonnage, dimensions, year of build, ownership etc. you can also see photographs of the vessel and the specifics of when she was ordered, when construction began, launch date, date of her first movement…etc. In short you have a potted history of the vessel.

The site also offers detail of a vessel’s sailings and arrivals which can be filtered by date or by port so for example you can search for QM2’s ports of call in 2006 which included several in South America including Rio de Janeiro, Montevideo and Valparaiso.

Lloyds List 2

Along with ‘Lloyd’s List Intelligence’ Guildhall Library also subscribes to ‘Lloyd’s List’ which we hold from the earliest surviving issue (1740). This historic newspaper ceased to be published in hard copy in 2013 but our online subscription means you can access their shipping news back to 1997 as well as look at recent editions of the e-newspaper.
Access is available in Guildhall Library only and you will need to provide proof of your name and address. You may also wish to bring along a notebook to record the gems you discover as printing and downloading of content is not permitted.

Lloyds List 3

Jeanie Smith
Assistant Librarian and Keeper of the Lloyd’s Marine Collection
(All images are from the Lloyd’s Marine Collection)


“Madonna or Whore: A Woman’s lot in Victorian England” – A Talk Review by Morgan Clark (GHL Placement Student)

This talk, by Jennifer Toynbee-Holmes, took place on the 28th of June 2016.

As a woman I found this talk highly interesting; Jennifer’s depth of knowledge was incredible. The talk made clear that there were two different representations of women in Victorian society: one the virtuous mother; submissive and powerless, also known as the Angel in the House, and the other the fallen woman; a woman of temptation and prostitution.

Queen Victoria was an influential role model in the Victorian period, as shown by Franz Xaver Winterhalter’s painting ‘The Royal Family” (1846). This presented the family as obedient and well dressed. Jennifer also spoke of the Queen as the mother of the nation, whose devotion to her husband Prince Albert was clear. However, despite this representation of Queen Victoria, we were also told that she was characterised as a woman who hated infants and being pregnant. This enriching talk also spoke about the huge impact the Pre-Raphaelites had on the representation of the ideal woman.

To illustrate her talk, Jennifer showed examples of famous Victorian paintings in the Victoria and Albert Museum and the Guildhall Art Gallery, some of which depicted ideal women who were dressed modestly, thus maintaining ideologies of purity and virtue. Juxtaposed with these were paintings of “fallen” women, portrayed as those whose sexual innocence had been lost, and who were depicted in a highly sexualised way for the period, for example, wearing low-cut dresses coupled with short hemlines. This was my favourite section of the talk as it showed how women who were deemed “fallen” were given more of an identity and power by comparison to modest wives. Jennifer spoke proudly of women who were able to redeem their situation, making it clear that not all “fallen” women ended up dying on the streets. Neither was it inevitable that they would commit suicide, despite the prevalence of the Thames in Victorian paintings with its overtones of death by drowning as the outcast woman’s last resort.

This talk was also appealing because it defended women and spoke about the unfair society they lived in. Before the Married Women’s Property Acts of 1870 and 1882, a woman’s money and property automatically became her husband’s when she married. Even the Matrimonial Causes Act of 1857, which widened the availability of divorce, showed that the Victorian double standard still operated in favour of men. A husband could divorce his wife solely on the grounds of her adultery, whereas a woman could only obtain a divorce if there was proof of her husband’s incest, cruelty, bigamy or desertion, in addition to adultery. The result was that many women remained trapped in unhappy marriages. An adulteress woman was still a sinner, whereas men were allowed mistresses without recrimination. To me, this was a very powerful section of the talk.

This talk links nicely with others that have taken place at Guildhall Library, including one in March by Bridget O’Donnell http://bridget-odonnell.com/minahan/

Some Pre-Raphaelite paintings which relate to this talk can be seen in Guildhall Art Gallery. Here are some examples:

Madonna 1


Madonna 2


Furthermore, a collection from George Cruikshank’s The drunkard’s children: A sequel to the bottle. In eight plates, also has a bearing on the topic of “fallen” women.

Madonna 3

Madonna 4

Madonna 5

By: Morgan Clark (Lord Mayor’s Cultural Scheme Placement Student)

Images: Guildhall Library Collections

A Regency Dance Experience

Are you partial to Empire Line? Ever wondered about what it might be like to have attended a Regency Dance back in the days of Jane Austen?

Guildhall Library hosted a Regency Dance Experience on the 14th June 2016 in the Livery Hall, Guildhall.

Regency Dance 1

Regency Dance 2

Regency Dance 3

More than 90 dancers, many clad in intricate period costume, moved gracefully to the strains of the live Regency band, the Fortuna Trio, under the expert direction of Mrs Bennet from Mrs Bennet’s Ballroom.

Dance Circle 2

Dance Line 2

Dance Smile

Guests thoroughly enjoyed the event and said how wonderful it was to have the opportunity to dance in such a splendid venue. We hope to hold another such event in the near future.
Isabelle Chevallot
Assistant Librarian Guildhall Library

The Wonders of George Loddiges’ Botanical Cabinet

Loggies 1

Botanical Cabinet Title Page (Reference Volume 2, GC 1.4)

George Loddiges (1786–1846) was a nurseryman who publicised his collections of plants and ferns in a publication called The Botanical Cabinet. The serial which ran from 1817-1833 was essentially a business sale catalogue, but one of great beauty, which eventually included around 2000 coloured plates of rare plants from around the world.

The Loddiges’ Hackney business was founded by George’s father, Conrad, a native of Hanover, and their nursery was on the site of the current Hackney Town Hall (Mare Street). The family firm was already thriving but George was to be an innovative businessman in his use of this publication and in the development of an unusual and very special collection of plants.

The arboretum at the Hackney site was begun in 1816 and a decade later Loddiges were offering 2600 hardy trees and shrubs in their catalogue but there were more innovations to come.

By the 1820s The Conrad Loddiges & Sons Nursery had also established an international reputation for the growing of tropical orchids and they were probably the first British firm to cultivate them commercially. Many of these orchids were to appear in ‘The Botanical Cabinet’ and by 1839 George Loddiges was able to produce the firm’s first catalogue devoted to their sale. In honour of his achievements, two orchids were named after him, Acropera Loddigesii which he introduced from Mexico and Cattleya Loddigesii from Brazil.

Loggies 2

Botanical Cabinet No.78 ‘Orchis Spectabilis’. George Loddiges designed this illustration and George Cooke engraved it. (Reference Volume 1, GC 1.4).

The collection of palms established by the nursery was extraordinary, mostly owing to George’s innovative use and development of hot houses. By the early 1830s his Grand Palm House was bursting to the frame with palms, ferns and orchids. The structure was 80 feet long, 60 feet wide and 40 feet high, the air was warmed by steam and the building had a platform from which one could view the tropical plant collection. Loddiges were already at the centre of the fern craze, offering around eighty exotic specimens by the late 1820s.

Loddiges Nursery was a popular attraction and the collection received numerous visitors from across Europe. John Loudon called the Palm House the largest hot-house in the world and it was said to display the best collection of palms and orchids in Europe. Loddiges also offered a large collection of camellias. The scale of the Palm House was unrivalled at the time predating the stove conservatory at Chatsworth (1836-40) and Decimus Burton’s Palm House at the Royal Botanic Gardens at Kew (1848) demonstrating the innovative nature of Loddiges’ business.

In 1836 George Loddiges produced a catalogue which included 1549 roses alone and there were always potted plants for visitors to buy. ‘The Botanical Cabinet’ ran alongside the firm’s catalogues producing a colour guide to what could be seen and purchased at their Hackney botanic nursery garden. Many of the drawings were made by George himself and some by his daughter Jane and the young Edward Cooke (Jane’s husband) who became a leading Victorian artist. The publication is valued for its engravings, most of which are by Edward’s father, George Cooke. The engravings could not be reprinted because all 2000 of the copper plates were stolen.

Loggies 3

Botanical Cabinet No33 ‘Liparia Hirsuta’, a native of the Cape which was introduced in 1792. George Loddiges designed this particular illustration and George Cooke engraved it (Reference Volume 1, GC 1.4).

Loggies 4

Botanical Cabinet No.31 Crinum Erubescens. The artist was George Cooke (Reference Volume 1, GC 1.4).

George Loddiges died in Hackney on 5th June 1846 and was buried at St John-at-Hackney. His son Conrad continued to run the nurseries with his Uncle William Loddiges but rising land prices and increased pollution were factors in the final end of the nursery in 1852.

Loggies 5

Post Office London Directory for 1827

Jeanie Smith
Assistant Librarian

Find out more…

Guildhall Library holds a full run of The Botanical Cabinet 1817-1833 (Reference GC 1.4) which forms part of the Library of the Worshipful Company of Gardeners. If you would like to visit to look at these volumes do bring along proof of your name and address.

A.R.P. Hayden, ‘Loddiges, George (1786–1846)’, rev. Oxford Dictionary of National Biography, Oxford University Press, 2004 [http://www.oxforddnb.com/view/article/37683, accessed 9 May 2016]
Access in the library or online with a City of London library card.

David Solman
Loddiges of Hackney: The Largest Hothouse in the World
The Hackney Society, 1995.
Reference SL 45.5

Feeding London: The Forgotten Market Gardens exhibition is at Guildhall Library until the 24th June.

Feeding London & Horticultural History At Guildhall Library

FLH1As temperatures rise and the growing season is upon us we are celebrating the history of gardening and food production in and for London at Guildhall Library.

‘Feeding London: the Forgotten Market Gardens’ is our current exhibition which runs from 4th April – 24th June. It highlights the long history of market gardening in South West London, telling the story of commercial food growing in the area and includes sound-recorded memories of workers and families. It is accompanied by a selection of material from Guildhall Library’s fascinating gardening collections.

The exhibition is curated by Jam Yesterday, Jam Tomorrow; a Heritage Lottery funded project run by the Environment Trust for Richmond upon Thames.


On the 5th April we held an evening event to launch the exhibition in which we learned more about the Jam Yesterday project.   Juliana Vandegrift, Heritage Project Manager & Oral Historian for the project spoke about the setting up of the project and some of its outcomes.  The research for the project has led to the creation of a Model Market Garden in Marble Hill Park, a collection of oral histories (some of which you can hear as part of the exhibition), a schools education programme and nationally recognised horticultural courses for young people. It has also produced the audio visual exhibition ‘Feeding London’ which visitors to Guildhall Library can currently enjoy.

You can find out more about the Jam Yesterday, Jam Tomorrow project on the Environment Trust website http://www.environmenttrust.co.uk/jam-yesterday-jam-tomorrow

Our second speaker was David Lawrie, oral historian & research volunteer for Jam Yesterday, Jam Tomorrow, who told us about the history of market gardening in the Twickenham, Hampton and Hounslow areas. David told the story through a document awarded in c1900 which forms part of the exhibition; the “Certificate of Achievement” issued to William Poupart for 35 years’ service to the Home Counties Market Growers Association.

William Poupart (b.1847) was brought up on a Bermondsey farm and his family name is associated with a variety of agricultural produce. He moved to Kew and by the late 1870s had expanded his business into the Twickenham area and to Marsh Farm in particular. His family business was later well known for the production of jam.

David’s talk also covered ‘Universal Provider’ William Whiteley who had a farm on which he grew the produce sold in his Bayswater store. As with his shop assistants he housed his workers on site. We know more about Whiteley because he commissioned a book in 1895 which included photographs of his farm – Alfred Barnard’s ‘Orchards and Gardens; Ancient and Modern’. The strawberries on Whiteley’s farm were picked by mostly female labour and he also had his own jam factory employing male chefs and female workers.

David also told us about local nurseryman and businessman A W Smith who was known as the ‘Cabbage King’, taking a million cabbages a year into Covent Garden. By around 1890 Smith owned 1000 acres at Feltham and was so influential he was able to have his own siding made to his farm off the London and South Western Railway line!

We were delighted that our audience were joined by descendants of the market gardeners who met and talked with people about their family history after the talks.

There are still a few places on our “Shirley Hibberd: The Father of Amateur Gardening” talk given by Anne Wilkinson on the 12th May and on an opportunity to see several volumes from the collection of the Worshipful Company of Gardeners held at Guildhall Library on 26th May. Both are free but you will need to book https://www.cityoflondon.gov.uk/things-to-do/guildhall-library/events-exhibitions/Pages/events.aspx


You can also see a write up and photographs of the exhibition launch on the Environment Trust’s blog http://www.environmenttrust.co.uk/blog/feeding-london-guildhall-library#.VxI8o9TR_ct

Jeanie Smith
Assistant Librarian

Neat Houses and Battersea Bundles: Market Gardening in London


Early Market Gardening

Market gardening or growing for profit developed in the sixteenth century as towns became large enough to allow making one’s living as a commercial grower viable. The Reverend Daniel Lysons in his “Environs of London” tells us that growing for profit or market gardening may have begun at Sandwich in Kent and its success there was soon followed by similar gardens closer to London. It is thought that Huguenot settlers may have been among these early market gardeners in Kent. Thomas Dorman records a list of the trades and occupations of Dutch Settlers in Sandwich taken from the Dutch Foreign Book of 1582, in which thirteen Huguenot settlers were market gardening in the area.

Before that time monasteries, private gardens and the surplus from large houses were sources of food supply for London but their role decreased during the sixteenth century with the dissolution of the monasteries and increased pressure on land for building. In his ‘Survey of London’ John Stow recorded an early market gardener named Cawsway who worked land at Houndsditch growing herbs and roots, but by 1553 the land was “parcelled into Gardens, wherein are now many faire houses of pleasure builded…” This pressure upon the land was to increase in the following centuries.

The Development of Market Gardening for London

The first market gardeners to supply London worked land along the Thames where the soil was rich, transport was easy and there was access to plentiful horse dung. The granting of charters to the Gardeners’ and the Fruiterers’ Companies in 1605 may evidence that market gardening was becoming important in the early seventeenth century. Webber tells us that the Gardeners’ Company appears to have owned or rented large market gardens outside the City and by 1649 they were reported as employing 1500 men, women and children as well as 400 apprentices. Lysons states that the principal places for fruit growing were Brentford, Isleworth, and Twickenham (known for strawberries) and Hammersmith, Kensington and Plumstead (known for cherries).

By the eighteenth century market gardening was thriving at the Neat House Gardens at Pimlico. The area was already known for its gardens but was now supplying London and Westminster with a range of fruit and vegetables.

“Water from the Thames was brought to the gardens through sluices while hothouses made possible the growing of early and tender crops. Dung from the London streets was used in abundance. The gardens were a training ground for young market gardeners and did much to raise the standard of British horticulture. By the end of the eighteenth century they covered 200 acres and were providing a gross income of £200,000 a year. They succumbed to the spread of London a few years later when the ground level was raised by soil excavated from St Katharine’s Docks and built upon.” (Webber, 34)

These market gardens of Pimlico were mentioned by John Strype in his 1720 Survey:

“The Neat Houses are a Parcel of Houses, most seated on the Banks of the River Thames, and inhabited by Gardiners; for which it is of Note, for the supplying London and Westminster Markets with Asparagus, Artichoaks, Cauliflowers, Musmelons, and the like useful Things that the Earth produceth; which by Reason of their keeping the Ground so rich by dunging it, (and through the Nearness to London, they have the Soil cheap) doth make their Crops very forward, to their great Profit in coming to such good Markets.”

The Nineteenth Century and the decline of Market Gardening

Milne’s Land Utilisation Map of 1800 shows the position of market gardens as well as nurseries and orchards in and around London at the beginning of the nineteenth century. The map shows that west of the City on the north bank of the Thames were the market gardens of Tothill Fields followed by the Neat Houses. Earls Court had several ‘common gardens’ and Fulham to Hammersmith was largely made up of market gardens and arable land. Even as far west as Isleworth, Richmond and Twickenham there were plenty of vegetable and fruit growers.

Most of the market gardens east of the City were in Hackney, Bethnal Green and Hoxton and further out at West Ham, Plaistow and Poplar. The main potato growing areas of London were around Wanstead, Barking, Ilford and Plaistow.

South of the Thames was another belt of gardens through Greenwich, Deptford, New Cross, Camberwell and Lambeth. Asparagus became the speciality of the gardeners at Battersea and Londoners would travel there to buy ‘Battersea Bundles’ or Sparrow-grass (asparagus).

Maisie Brown describes the rise and success of the market gardens at Barnes and Mortlake. It was a hard life and she records market gardener William Breffit’s description of the marketing and distribution of the produce (c1814).

“Every gardener had his market cart or carts which were loaded at sunset, leaving the garden grounds between 10pm and 1am. Each cart was accompanied by a driver and a person to sell the produce, often the gardener’s wife. They would reach Covent Garden Market between 3am and 5am when dealers would be waiting to do business. Sales would be completed by 7am at the latest, when the produce would be taken to retail shops and markets by ‘ill-paid Irish women who carried loads of up to one hundredweight on their heads, to all parts of London’[Quoting Sir Richard Phillips ‘A Morning’s Walk from London to Kew’]. The carts were back home by nine or ten in the morning. According to Phillips, this was the way of life of every gardener’s family within ten miles of London – of some every night and of others every other night – for at least six months of the year.”

Rates of pay were comparatively good but market garden workers still lived in overcrowded and often insanitary conditions and were hampered by a lack of income during winter.


As we have seen the tension between use of land for produce or building has been part of London life for centuries. Brown states “There can be little doubt that London created the market gardens. What is equally certain is that they were destroyed by London, when its need for land became as pressing as its need for food.” (38)

Writer and architect Thomas Hardy was to reflect this building boom in Chapter 41 of his novel ‘The Hand of Ethelberta’:

“On an extensive plot of ground, lying somewhere between the Thames and the Kensington squares, stood the premises of Messrs. Nockett and Perch, builders and contractors. The yard with its workshops formed part of one of those frontier lines between mangy business and garnished domesticity that occur in what are called improving neighbourhoods. We are accustomed to regard increase as the chief feature in a great city’s progress, its well-known signs greeting our eyes on every outskirt. Slush-ponds may be seen turning into basement-kitchens; a broad causeway of shattered earthenware smothers plots of budding gooseberry-bushes and vegetable trenches, foundations following so closely upon gardens that the householder may be expected to find cadaverous sprouts from overlooked potatoes rising through the chinks of his cellar floor.”

You can find out more about the history of market gardening in Guildhall Library’s collections and upcoming exhibition, “Feeding London: The Forgotten Market Gardens”,  from 4 April – 24 June. Here are just a few items you may enjoy…

Maisie Brown’s “The Market Gardens of Barnes and Mortlake: the Rise and Fall of a Local Industry” (Ref. Pam 18103)
Thomas Dorman’s “Notes on the Dutch Walloons and Huguenots at Sandwich in the Sixteenth and Seventeenth Centuries.” In Proceedings of the Huguenot Society of London, 2 (1887-88): 205-240.
Rev Daniel Lysons “The Environs of London” Volume 4 Herts, Essex and Kent (Ref. SL 93)
John Stow’s ‘The Survey of London’ (Ref. L 71)
Malcolm Thick’s “The Neat House Gardens: Early Market Gardening around London” (Ref. L 45.5)
Alan Charles Bell Urwin’s “Commercial Nurseries and Market Gardens” (Ref. ST 297)
Ronald Webber’s “Market Gardening: The History of Commercial Flower, Fruit and Vegetable Growing.” (Ref. 635)
E J Willson’s “West London Nursery Gardens” (Ref. L 45.5)


Jeanie Smith
Assistant Librarian

The Worshipful Company of Glaziers and Painters of Glass through the Ages

Our current exhibition has been put together by the Worshipful Company of Glaziers and Painters of Glass, and takes you on a journey through the life of the Company, from its historical beginnings, to its work in the present day, which includes supporting students and creating new work, often for secular buildings.

Front Banner and Drape2

The first recorded reference to a Guild of Glaziers in London is in 1328. It regulated and protected those who practised the art. Foreign competition and unfair trading practices led it to seek a Royal Charter from King Charles I in 1638.

It had a Hall at this time but, like so many other Livery Halls, it was destroyed in the Great Fire of London in 1666. The Company remained without a Hall until 1978. The ‘new’ Hall is held by the Company on a long lease on a ‘peppercorn’ rent (meaning nominal) – the rent each year is a piece of glass made by artist members of the Company. It often makes reference to an incoming Master. There are five of these beautiful rents on display in the exhibition!

Wall Drape

As well as displaying some of the Company’s precious items from the past, the exhibition also looks to the future. One of the most striking artefacts on display is a wall hanging, commissioned by Past Master Glazier Peter Doe and his wife Liveryman Janet Doe and first unveiled in the River Room at Glaziers Hall by the Lord Mayor in spring last year. It celebrates the relationship between the Glaziers Company and the River Thames. The stitching was undertaken by prisoners from across the UK supported by Fine Cell Work, the charity which trains inmates in embroidery and textile skills.

If you wanted to find out more about the Company, Guildhall Library holds some of their archive. Material that is available to view includes charters, minutes and apprentice bindings.

The exhibition at Guildhall Library is free and open until 23 March.

Amy Randall
Events and Exhibitions Officer
Guildhall Library